Consumer Dispute Resolution Bewertungen 

I spent a ton of time compiling evidence against Currys who had a subcontractor install our washing machine, and who did not check water was off and flooded my house. I provided photographs, call logs, timelines, and correspondence, all consistently showing the damage and that it was caused by their subcontractors, and that they were wilfully fobbing me off on the subcontractor, who just lied and said he hadn’t done it. Currys’ defence was one blurry photo of my washing machine, an incomplete call log, and a statement that they were satisfied they’d investigated (without providing any substantiating evidence of this) and that I couldn’t prove the damage was their fault. CDRL sided with the retailer. Completely pointless.

Dont bother taking the time, painstakingly raising a case. They are completely biased to currys. If your thinking of buying from currys do it through pay pal so you have some protection if currys make a mistake. As the customer service is appalling.

Reported OVO for failing to provide the boiler service that was part of our contract, despite chasing them several times and eventually getting radio silence from them.

As a result, I made a claim for compensation of the alternative boiler service I had to arrange to maintain our boiler warranty. The claim failed on the basis that the work was "not approved by the Respondent prior to the Claimant employing the third-party". Had I waited any longer for OVO's approval, the boiler warranty would have lapsed.

I would say the current 1.3-star rating on TrustPilot is well justified since you cannot rely on this service to resolve a dispute outside of court, as the service was intended to achieve.

What an absolute farce this arbitration service is. Not interested in providing any sort of justice for the consumer and only there to protect the big businesses that refer you to them.
Next stop is the small claims court for me as I am not letting this drop

After seeing the reviews here, am I surprised that CDRL sided with Currys, despite a clear breach of my consumer rights? Absolutely not.
Don't bother wasting your time appealing with them - they're clearly biased against the customer and will rule in favour of the retailer every time, it seems.

CDRL closed my case without giving me an adjudication outcome or even contacting me. I was assigned an adjudicator, and then silence until I checked the portal weeks later and found it marked "closed." No communication, no fair process.

Completely unacceptable.

Contacted these over a dispute with Ryanair ( booked to go to cyprus covid struck. Ryanairs web site said flights to cyprus suspended, cyprus wouldnt let brits in. All over the news and media. Ryanair said we were no shows)!
Took it to these , made a ruling , i sent 32 pages of evidence, i got a response couldnt open your evidence, ruled in favour of ryanair.Utter sham, unprofessional and biase

I ordered a PAX wardrobe from IKEA, and the experience was a nightmare. During delivery, their team damaged a newly replastered wall, and key parts were missing during installation. I had to drive to the store while the fitter waited, which caused extra charges and disrupted my work.

I spent weeks chasing IKEA through live chat, getting nowhere with endless reference numbers and no real progress. Eventually, I escalated to CDRL, not expecting much, but they were absolutely brilliant.

Within four weeks of raising the issue online, IKEA compensated me for the wall damage, paid the fitter’s invoice, and even added a bit more. CDRL exceeded all expectations — fast, professional, and effective.

I was genuinely impressed by how smoothly they handled everything after IKEA failed to act. If you're stuck dealing with a retailer that won’t take responsibility, I highly recommend going through CDRL. They turned a stressful situation into a proper resolution.

Found this "resolution"center through IKEA website and tried to settle the dispute, where IKEA took the in-warranty sofa that developed a sacking defect and refused to refund for it. Total waste of time like others have claimed, there're no resolution at all, no logic tied to consumer laws behind these decisions, they just ruled out that whatever company said is the correct course of action without taking into consideration the consumer rights

This "service" is a total waste of time. The portal is not fit for purpose. It is impossible to contact any human either by phone or email. The whole system is set up so that people with genuine complaints have no alternative but to give up trying to pursue them. Those managing this system should be totally ashamed of themselves.

This arbitration service is a complete disgrace. The process is rigged, biased, and designed to protect the company, not deliver justice. They put in people who have no real understanding of the law, no proper training, and no ability to run a fair hearing. It was obvious from the very start that the decision was going to go in the company’s favour, no matter what I said or what evidence I provided.

If you are reading this because you are about to go through arbitration: don’t. Save yourself the frustration, the wasted time, and the false hope. This system is not about fairness — it’s about power.

And to those who run this process: you may think you can keep hiding behind the word “neutral,” but you cannot escape accountability forever. Karma has a way of catching up.

I have raised numerous complaints and support tickets with CDRL regarding the service I've received from AviationADR.
CDRL refuse to acknowledge any of my complaints despite having been told for months that I'll be contacted within 30 days.
AviationADR have failed in their duty of fairly and fully adjudicating cases and CDRL are supposed to hold them to account but CDRL themselves are equally incompetent in dealing with service complaints.

Don't waste your time; you will submit all the evidence possible, and they will still side with the retailer.

Scam umbrella company that supposedly acts as an alternative resolution firm for various companies. This is purely criminal as it's a company which is claimed to do a service but doesn't really do it. This allows firms like British Gas to claim they're regulated, when in fact, they're not really. Don't hate British Gas though, thank the Government who are paid off by the rich.

CDRL are clearly biased towards retailers. Even when presented with evidence of goods that are not fit for purpose and numerous emails showing slow and dismissive customer sevice they decide in favour of the retailers.

The CDRL interface is clunky and hard to navigate and frequently stops working, making the whole process of recording details and uploading evidence very difficult.

I'm so very disappointed, it seems there is no protection for customers to be found at the CDRL. I wish I'd read the numerous other poor reviews before wasting time and money making a claim via the CDRL.

Well what can I say - had my decision today and I don’t get why I was under the illusion that I had a chance of winning my claim against Curry’s. It was ruled against me. Apparently the decision was based on me not being able to prove that the washing machine I had bought, which totally ruined my LVT flooring due to a leak, was my responsibility. I quote “it is incumbent on the claimant to provide on the balance of probability that the machine is not of adequate quality at the time of delivery”. What about Consumer rights?
WTH is that supposed to mean? How can I determine if the machine works or not on delivery?? My flooring was ruined and the engineer who collected the washer the following day, confirmed it was the machine that had a fault/leak and took it away. How much more evidence do they need?
Oh of course, silly me it’s CURRY’S, and all claims get ruled in their favour. Funny goings on there in my opinion. I’m gutted. The amount of work I’ve put into this and in all good faith only to be rubbished like everyone one else on here.
Small Claims Court next stop. I will not concede this injustice and take it as far as I possibly can.
Curry’s - don’t rest on your laurels because I will not let this go.
CDRL - a report against you is going to CTSI

Absolute disgusting waste of time and totally biased towards the retailers. Purchased a £1500 OLED TV from Currys and the BBC IPlayer and other apps are jumpy. They have blamed my WI-FI, (Virgin 500 Fibre), the construction of walls in my house, said there was a possible update that might sort the issue out, and blamed anything but the TV, despite the fact the fault happened in their own repair facility! Went to CDRL and provided irrefutable evidence of all Currys lies, their failure to repair the TV, their failure to turn up to collect the TV at the right time etc etc. CDRL found in favour of Currys, and I still have a TV that doesn’t work properly nearly 7 months down the line. What a surprise. Clearly paid by Currys to deal with all their disputes, of which there are many!

Had a dispute with Corgi Homeserve which I didn’t accept their final decision. I therefore tried to lodge a complaint against then with CDRL. I filled in the form on line but since then I have been unable to acces their dashboard to respond to tbd many emails they are sending me. I have rung them, emailed them them for assistance but nothing heard back. I am running out of time to complete my complaint which is very stressful.

Total waste of time, a lot of time. I found the arbitrator's report unacceptably biased and factually incorrect, favouring the retailer (Currys) and largely disregarding the information that I had provided and the statements that I had made. It makes me wonder how "carefully" the arbitrators consider the evidence (despite their statement to that effect) and whether my particular report was largely created by AI.
If CDRL is funded by the industry whose customers it supposedly serves, there is an inherent conflict of interest, and my case is a perfect example of how this service is biased towards its funder instead of being an independent and objective party. Do not expect any justice from this service.

Total BS this company gets memebers to pay them to deal with their deiputes. The dashboard is clunky, too many links and is designed to slow the claimant down and hinder older people who would struggle. They pretend to be fair but in reality they are like a loss adjustor and simply want to keep the claims low to justify their membership. Crooks, no appeals and dragged out to put people off and hope they miss a message or request to respond. No face no appeal just a front for ripping people off.