Misleading product descriptions
I purchased some Pokemon cards from them. They advertised that the box contained 36 booster packs. However, I they only sent 6 packs (super overpriced for 6 packs). The listing was misleading, and when confronted they refused to accept responsibility, instead blaming their supplier and refused to offer an acceptable solution.
This experience makes me question Gameology's advertising accuracy and customer service policies.
My advice would be Do not buy Pokémon TCG, trading cards, or other collectibles from them.
Key Issues:
❌ Misleading product descriptions
❌ Poor customer service
If you're looking for trusted retailers for Pokémon cards in Australia, I would suggest looking elsewhere unless Gameology improves its accuracy, transparency, and customer service.
EDIT IN RESPONSE TO GAMEOLOGY REPLY:
Thanks for your response.
However, I want to clarify a few important points for anyone reading this:
The gift card offered was only $10, which doesn’t come close to making up for the price discrepancy.
I paid $109 for what was advertised as a box of 36 booster packs. What I received was just 6 packs — something that would cost around $42–$60 at EB Games or other stores local to me. A partial refund or gift card in that range ($40–$60) would have been a much more reasonable resolution (although the difference between 6 and 36 packs would be closer to $200), but Gameology refused even the lower suggestion. To be clear, I would not accept a gift card after this experience, only a refund or partial refund.
Offering a full return sounds fair on the surface, but the process is inconvenient and puts the burden of correcting Gameology’s mistake entirely on me — the customer. They have stated the returned product will go through quality assurance before they refund, so there is a chance I get no money back if anything is damaged in shipping.
Yes, mistakes happen, but how companies respond is what matters. In this case, the compensation offered feels inadequate, and the overall resolution placed all of the responsibility on the customer, rather than owning and fixing the problem adequately.
29. März 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung