invalid codes returned the same message for every problem. I could not tell whether the code had expired, was mistyped or simply did not apply to my account. I eventually got through it, although the... Mehr ansehen
Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren
Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren
Das sagen Bewerter
player names were duplicated without context. Two players with similar names appeared in the market and the interface did not make the distinction clear. The site gave me no confidence that repeating... Mehr ansehen
I use increased text size and some buttons became partially hidden. A small improvement would go a long way because right now larger system text broke parts of the layout. Returning later did not make... Mehr ansehen
bet notifications arrived in batches. Several updates came through at once long after the events had changed. I eventually got through it, although the route there was unnecessarily messy. It made com... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmensdetails
Vom Unternehmen geschrieben
Finn nettcasinoer med raske utbetalinger, enkle betalingsprosesser og tydelige vilkår for norske brukere.
Kontaktinformationen
Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen
Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.
So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot
Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.
Das haben sich andere Leute angesehen
I went in expecting a routine task
I went in expecting a routine task. Instead, the mobile search covered the results while typing. The keyboard and suggestions left too little room to see what had been found. It made comparing my options harder than it needed to be.
I missed one required field and had to…
I missed one required field and had to retype the entire message. Once that happened, the form cleared after a validation error. I had to stop and work out what the site was trying to tell me. It was particularly annoying in the middle of an active session.
invalid codes returned the same message…
invalid codes returned the same message for every problem. I could not tell whether the code had expired, was mistyped or simply did not apply to my account. I eventually got through it, although the route there was unnecessarily messy. It became more irritating after I ran into it again.
I only realised how awkward it was when I would rather a
the option to cancel a withdrawal was too prominent. I only realised how awkward it was when I would rather a submitted cashout simply continue than have a large reverse-withdrawal button sitting beside it. The desktop layout had enough room to explain this better.
The site gave me no confidence that repeating the same action would in player props
player names were duplicated without context. Two players with similar names appeared in the market and the interface did not make the distinction clear. The site gave me no confidence that repeating the same action would behave the same way. For a routine visit, this took far too much attention.
The site gave me no confidence that repeating the same action would in e-wallet deposit
the e-wallet option disappeared at checkout. It was shown on the payment-method page but was not available when I actually tried to deposit. The site gave me no confidence that repeating the same action would behave the same way. I came back to it later and still found the presentation unclear.
I thought I had missed something, but the real issue was that in breadcrumbs
After opening a detail page I had to rebuild the same path from the main menu. I thought I had missed something, but the real issue was that there was no clear route back to the previous category. This happened during otherwise normal use.
I could live with a small…
I could live with a small inconvenience, but changing an old phone number depended on access to the old number. I no longer had the SIM and the account page did not offer a practical alternative. This one kept getting in the way. Returning later did not make the process any clearer.
I use increased text size and some…
I use increased text size and some buttons became partially hidden. A small improvement would go a long way because right now larger system text broke parts of the layout. Returning later did not make the process any clearer.
Because Some rewards activated automatically while others needed a manual claim, and
claim buttons were inconsistent. Because Some rewards activated automatically while others needed a manual claim, and the difference was not obvious, I ended up double-checking something that should have been obvious. For a routine visit, this took far too much attention.
bet notifications arrived in batches
bet notifications arrived in batches. Several updates came through at once long after the events had changed. I eventually got through it, although the route there was unnecessarily messy. It made comparing my options harder than it needed to be.
I could browse a feature and only…
I could browse a feature and only learned at activation that it was unavailable for my account. I expected country restrictions to remove uncertainty, but availability information appeared too late. For a routine visit, this took far too much attention.
self-exclusion information was spread…
self-exclusion information was spread across help pages. I only realised how awkward it was when For something this important, I expected the options and consequences to be explained in one place. For a routine visit, this took far too much attention.
CASH ERUPTION THEN A DISPLAY LIE
Screenshot twice and they still said glitch! I framed nothing I wanted a wire! PAY THE BURST!
bet notifications arrived in batches
bet notifications arrived in batches. Several updates came through at once long after the events had changed. By the end I had more questions than when I started. The desktop layout had enough room to explain this better.
notification categories were too broad
notification categories were too broad. I wanted bet-result alerts without promotional pushes, but the controls did not separate them cleanly. It did not stop me completely, though it made the experience noticeably worse. For a routine visit, this took far too much attention.
I gave it another try later and ran…
I gave it another try later and ran into the same basic issue: no useful time estimate was shown. The withdrawal page said processing but gave me no indication whether that meant hours or days. A second attempt produced the same kind of confusion.
The receipt shortened the market name…
The receipt shortened the market name so much that I had to reopen the event to confirm what I had placed. Instead of helping, bet confirmation slowed me down because confirmation lacked enough market detail. For a routine visit, this took far too much attention.
Technical errors used codes with no explanation
One detail bothered me more than I expected: technical errors used codes with no explanation. I received a number and had to contact support just to learn what kind of problem it represented. The desktop layout had enough room to explain this better.
changing an old phone number depended…
changing an old phone number depended on access to the old number. I no longer had the SIM and the account page did not offer a practical alternative. I eventually got through it, although the route there was unnecessarily messy. I came back to it later and still found the presentation unclear.
So funktioniert Trustpilot
Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.
Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.
Hier finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.
Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.
Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.








