A mega huge thanks to Christopher at night concierge from Wimbledon Stadia Development for staying for handover and beyond. Taking ownership and handling like a pro the situation with the water supply... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren
Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren
A mega huge thanks to Christopher at night concierge from Wimbledon Stadia Development for staying for handover and beyond. Taking ownership and handling like a pro the situation with the water supply... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
A huge thank you to Donta at Prospect Place for finding me a more convenient car parking space while mine is out of action. There was a delay at first due to email problems but as soon as he picked it... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Our building Relationship Manager Desiree is a massive asset. Since she arrived a whole raft of issues that had been left for far too long are finally being addressed. She goes above and beyond in her... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
The lift in my building in Shoreditch has now been broken for 3 weeks. There has been almost no communication as to why that is from the Ringley Group and only stalling answers when directly address... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Ringley is an independent, award-winning, privately owned business specialising in residential property, with over 20 years’ experience and 10,000 homes under management.
1 Castle Road, NW1 8PR, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen
Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.
Hat 93 % seiner negativen Bewertungen beantwortet
Antwortet meist innerhalb von 2 Wochen
So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot
Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.
Nusha is very professional personand helpful soul, thx for your support

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Nusha has been great help during my tenancy.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
I have been a tenant with my partener in a flat in Hunslet House over a year. We recently moved out but we were really happy with the flat and management. The process went smoothly from the beginning until the very last day when we handed the keys over.
Thank you Nusha and Steve for all your help and support during the contract.
I wish you all the best and are greatful for going above and beyond to answer promptly each time.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
I think the other residents of Union Park have already explained in great detail what kind of company Ringley is.
Therefore, I will only say this: please avoid them at all costs if you don’t want to pay for a company whose only “service” is shifting the burden onto the residents, as that is the easiest way for them to get money. No transparency, no information—only requests and blame.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
The Ringley Group helped us achieve right to manage on a large and complex residential estate in south west London. Guiding us through the legal process, the acquisition and site set up.
Following a tricky relationship with the freeholder's managing agent which lead us to go through the RTM process and appoint Ringley, they has been a breath of fresh air. The staff are clearly very passionate about what they do, extremely knowledgeable and the changes we have been able to put in place at the site in the couple of months since RTM took place, in collaboration with the RTM directors, have quickly improved the quality of the service, the look of the site, with savings already made in-year.
We look forward to working with the team as we make further improvements and savings here at Wimbledon Stadia - expanding our on-site staff to create a real strong team spirit, as we collaborate with local businesses, suppliers and charities.
The RTM process means leaseholders are in control, and can work with Ringley to build a decedent budget, with full transparency.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
I would like to take a moment to recognise Andrew, the cleaner at Holly Court. He is one of the most hardworking and dedicated people I’ve ever come across. I never see him when he isn’t working—he is always busy keeping the area spotless.
Andrew goes above and beyond every single day. He’s friendly, polite, and always willing to help. Whether it’s holding the door open or offering a hand if he sees someone struggling with bags, his small acts of kindness make a big difference.
On one occasion, Andrew helped my mother, who was very unwell and walking around in a state of delirium. His calm and caring response meant so much to me and my family.
It’s rare to find someone who takes so much pride in their work while also genuinely caring about the people around them. Andrew is a real asset to Holly Court, and I hope his efforts are properly recognised.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Always facing reality, and providing you with the best service!

Antwort von The Ringley Group
We have enn sending email to Emile Strydom concerning caldding issue of any works not covered by Taylor Wimpey and asking who is responsible. Its been a few weeks now and all he suggest best to contact the legal department which we have. Now the legal team and Taylor Wimpey are saying that he is responsible as he is doing the 10 years plan and budget. Such a quick answer and it takes him ages to reply to us. No idea why we pay for service charge and receive no response from the relationship manager at all. Disappointed

Antwort von The Ringley Group
I have been a resident at Warren house for the past 25 years and we have never ever really had a proper Building manager in all these years. The new manager Mr.W.Johnson is really professional, always in hand and easily reachable. He personally sorted out some important issues I had with parking ticket as well as some personal ones in no time and with sincere desire to help. Well done Mr.Johnson, you are indeed the manager we needed for so long ! Thank you for all your help and support ! Warmest regards , Angelika

Antwort von The Ringley Group
I had a fantastic experience with Ringley's and especially with Nichola, who was my valuer. The whole process was very prompt, with excellent communication throughout. Nichola went above and beyond, taking time out of her busy schedule to answer all my questions and provide really helpful guidance. I really appreciated her professionalism and support. I’d definitely recommend Nichola and the Ringley's team to anyone looking for a reliable and responsive service.
*** This is a post for the response Ringley left on my previous review ****
Your reply completely sidesteps the substance of my review. Instead of addressing the serious points raised—financial mismanagement, neglect of repairs, fire safety failings, and misleading communications—you repeat the same narrative that leaseholders at Union Park have heard for years: that the burden sits with us.
This is not true. All of the defects you refer to—cladding, balconies, alarms, waking watch, lifts—are historic defects in the original construction. Under the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA), qualifying leaseholders are legally protected from having these remediation costs, and the related professional fees, pushed through the service charge. Under the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LAFRA), you are also prohibited from disguising costs as “members contributions” or other invented categories not found in the lease. Yet this is exactly what you are doing.
You claim the ManCo exists to protect leaseholders. In reality, with Ringley’s facilitation, the freeholder now sits as a director of the ManCo. This is a blatant conflict of interest: the party who should be pursued for costs is instead directing a company that seeks to impose them on leaseholders.
You also continue to mislead. When LB Hillingdon confirmed it would seek to recover Waking Watch costs from Ringley, you told leaseholders the opposite—that the bill would be passed to us. That was not an error; it was a deliberate attempt to frighten people into paying.
And let’s be honest: in your reply you say you would “be happy to meet with us to discuss our concerns.” That is a lie. You cancelled the EGM at the last minute, denying leaseholders the very platform we need to hold you accountable. You cannot claim openness and dialogue while simultaneously shutting down the only formal meeting we were scheduled to have.
Your most recent communications underline the same problem. You now claim “professional fees” for the fire alarm installation must fall to the service charge, despite the BSA clearly covering professional and related costs. You also continue to push balcony restrictions, heating system changes, and other measures as if leaseholders were liable. All of this blurs the lines in a way that benefits the freeholder, not the residents you are meant to serve.
The reality is simple: Ringley has failed to meet its fiduciary duty to leaseholders. Instead, you act for the freeholder, passing on unlawful charges, ignoring statutory protections, cancelling meetings, and endangering the wellbeing of over 250 families.
No amount of spin about “community” or “progress” will disguise this. Until you acknowledge leaseholder protections under law, stop mislabelling costs, reinstate proper leaseholder meetings, and remove the conflicts of interest you created, your reassurances ring hollow.
I bought the two bed apartment as a dream place however in 5 years it has become a nightmare and total disaster. The SC has sky rocketed and the managing agent has failed to managed this place and just waiting to get out of this mess. Anyone who is planning to invest do a proper research so that you avoid this kind of situations like many of us.
Do not use this company!!!
If you read the 1* reviews here, the comments are all true.
Ringleys Director, Ms Mary-Anne Bowring does not care one iota about its leaseholders. Working together with the freeholder Mr Gubbay they have managed to cause untold stress and ruining the lives of over 250 families, in just one housing complex and are only interested in one thing, lining their own pockets. Do not use unless you want a life of misery.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Bandits, charlatans, liers. Crooked organisation. Seem to think the law does not apply to them.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Honestly I wish I could have given this company 0 stars. Never have I come across such an incompetent and fraudulent company. Non existent customer service and passing unfair charges to leaseholders. The company and Grangeford management have run the Union Park development into a situation which has every leaseholder stressed to their core. Avoid this company at all costs!

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Beware of this company. I have been living in a development "managed" by Ringley for 6 years. I put it in quotation marks are we remain eager to see any kind of management. So far we have only seen shocking mismanagement, deceit, overcharging leaseholders, bullying, threatening and abuse. Serious and very concerning defects came to light years ago, including serious fire safety defects as well as risk of collapse of balcony structures. Both of which are immediate danger to life. Ringley had knowledge of these defects but did nothing to mitigate immediate danger to life for years. Mary-Anne Bowring and Lee Harle are both responsible as directors during the time of continued neglect.
London Fire Brigade and the council had to intervene for them to start caring. Not about the safety and well-being of residents of course, but caring about converging their backs. They implemented a waking watch at extortionate costs and pushed all costs onto innocent residents as if they hadn't suffered enough. Thanks to Mary-Anne, now we live in unsafe buildings and get to pay insane amounts of money for this great pleasure. Mary-Anne Bowring also had the ingenious idea of "mitigating" unsafe balcony defects by sealing balcony doors shut. These are the only source of air in most of these flats but she was more than happy to suffocate people. This of course would not mitigate risk of collapse at all but instead it would be in direct violation of a great number of UK laws and Health and Safety regulations. Fire Safety Regulations clearly state that balcony doors must never be obstructed as these provide and escape route. Further risks are smoke accumulation, suffocation, overheating and thus making fire spread more rapidly, delayed smoke detection, delayed fire service access. It is also a major H&S risk due to inadequate ventilation (poor air quality, mould build up, build up of pollutants, etc... ). Shocking that I had to educate someone in the property business about building regulations and ask that they perhaps not violate fire safety regulations in a building that already struggles with sire safety defects. Mary-Anne's next wonderful idea was to rip balconies out and store them off site on our money. Sure, now that we understand that doors cannot be legally obstructed, why not remove the whole balcony so people can just fall straight out? Well done Mary-Anne, good thinking. The structure actually only requires a few simple fixes to be compliant. Not once did Mary-Anne consider maybe fixing the danger to life even though it would certainly be much cheaper than disassembling the structure and storing it long term. Noooo, why would she do that when she can just torture residents instead? Better to not mitigate danger to life and instead introduce further H&S violations. This woman lacks any common sense. Deliberately and systematically torturing leaseholders is a sport to her. This woman is a menace and a danger to society.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Avoid those scammers at any cost!
Their only interest if to charge you more and more and nothing get fixed.
They team up with the freeholder to rip you off.
Stay away from Ringley, Grangeford, Gubbay family and Mary-Anne Bowring.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
This so called property management company are a complete disgrace.
I wish I could give no stars !
They are only on the side of the developer and freeholder.
Avoid lat all costs.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Before you consider The Ringley Group, I urge you to read the 1-star reviews, specifically from residents of Union Park. Our stories are not one-off complaints; they are a consistent record of systemic failure and neglect.
My experience mirrors every other review from this development. Like the reviewer from May 2024, we are also suffering with "faulty balconies and fire safety concerns" that Ringley has known about for years. As another resident stated in April, the management is "appalling," and they have consistently failed to hold the freeholder or original builder to account, instead trying to make leaseholders pay for these historic defects.
The current crisis with our lifts being out of service for over 5 weeks—stranding the elderly and vulnerable—is not new. It is a direct result of the financial mismanagement and neglect other reviewers have highlighted.
Now, their proposed "solution" is as outrageous as their neglect: to rip off our balconies and store them off-site, all at our expense. This is not a repair; it is a destruction of our property value and a blatant attempt to avoid their responsibilities.
Ringley's sudden claim of "urgent health and safety" is a cynical stunt, as they have been aware of these issues since at least 2020. This is a perfect example of what another leaseholder called "managing the building into the ground."
Directors Maryanne and Lee Harley have presided over this chaos. The portrayal of expertise is a facade. In reality, as multiple reviews from our building attest, the company acts solely in the interest of the freeholder, treating leaseholders as an endless source of funds to fix problems we did not create.
Do not be fooled by their overall rating. Look at the reviews from the people they are actually supposed to serve. The pattern at Union Park is undeniable: neglect, evasion, and passing colossal costs onto residents. We are living proof that The Ringley Group is an absolute disaster of a management company.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
This company is a disgrace. Ringley along with Grangeford Assessment Management and the freeholder have run the Union Park development into the ground.
They have ignored serious building defects for years endangering people’s lives. As a management agent they do not represent the interests of the leaseholders and continually side with the freeholder who has a track record of running other developments into ground.

Antwort von The Ringley Group
Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.
Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.
Hier finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.
Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.
Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.