Our company
Our company, Clark Energies, attended the ACS Dallas Home & Garden Show at Fair Park, located at 3929 Grand Avenue, on Saturday and Sunday, August 15 and 16, 2026.
Specifically, on Saturday, while our team was conducting business in our booth and speaking with multiple homeowners, a Sunrun employee named Riley entered our booth and began shouting obscenities, disrupting our conversations, and disorganizing the promotional giveaways, table ornaments, and literature displayed on our table.
We politely requested that he leave our booth. He refused. We were forced to ask him four separate times before he finally left.
We identified him as a Sunrun employee because he was wearing Sunrun-branded apparel, and Sunrun’s booth was located approximately two aisles behind ours.
Following this incident, we located a member of the ACS event staff. I immediately recognized that he was not the primary event organizer, as he appeared to be approximately 20 years old. I explained what had occurred and asked whom I should speak with regarding the tumultuous and entirely unacceptable ordeal our company had just experienced.
His initial response was, “Well, we do a lot of business with Sunrun, so I’d rather not say anything.”
His second response was, “Well, how about I take you and find him, and we can talk it out?”
Let me be absolutely clear: Your proposed resolution is to take the victim and the individual responsible for the incident, immediately following the confrontation, and bring them together to talk? That is your remedy? That is your standard for handling a serious complaint from a paying exhibitor?
This is precisely why I am assigning a ONE-STAR rating to both this specific ACS representative and the event’s overall handling of the situation.
Our company does not pay to participate in these events to be berated, defamed, disrespected, or subjected to hostile disruptions while conducting legitimate business.
The fact that ACS conducts substantial business with Sunrun does not, under any circumstances, give Sunrun employees the right to enter another company’s booth, berate its representatives, disrupt its operations, or interfere with its ability to conduct business.
A commercial relationship with one exhibitor does not grant that exhibitor preferential treatment, nor does it diminish the rights, dignity, or professional standing of every other company participating in the event.
I consider the manner in which this incident was handled to be infantile, remedial, and extraordinarily unprofessional.
I want to make one distinction unequivocally clear: I do not hold Sunrun, as an entire organization, responsible for the conduct of one employee.
However, the individual responsible, Riley, should no longer be employed by that company. He should be terminated. His conduct was entirely unacceptable, and the ACS representative should have immediately reported the incident rather than attempting to dismiss or informally reconcile the situation.
Regarding the ACS representative, this young man appeared to be approximately 20 years old and demonstrated a profound lack of experience, professional judgment, and understanding of how to address a serious exhibitor complaint.
Despite his apparent inexperience, he explicitly stated that he was the appropriate individual to whom such incidents should be reported.
That makes his response even more concerning. If ACS designates an individual to address exhibitor complaints, that individual must possess the judgment, professionalism, and competence necessary to handle those complaints appropriately, regardless of age.
Instead, his immediate concern appeared to be ACS’s commercial relationship with Sunrun, rather than the unacceptable conduct directed toward another paying exhibitor.
That is not professionalism. That is not accountability. And that is certainly not an acceptable standard of exhibitor relations.
This is why I am giving ACS a ONE-STAR rating.
Furthermore, I want to acknowledge that our previous experiences with ACS have generally been average. Until this incident, we had no significant complaints regarding our participation in their events.
However, this particular experience has fundamentally changed our assessment of the organization and raised serious questions about its commitment to professionalism, impartiality, exhibitor protection, and accountability.
An event organizer’s responsibility is to every participating exhibitor—not merely those with whom it conducts the most business.
This incident has made us seriously question whether Clark Energies will ever conduct business with ACS again.








