Aston Bond Law Firm Bewertungen 

Not very professional, from what I see, they are a total bunch of clowns. They really should be prosecuted and struck off– they are a total disgrace to the legal profession. They are a low end legal firm.

Try to imagine a betrayal more disgusting than that which I suffered at the hands of Aston Bond. A company in which I had invested around £500,000 took me to court simply because the director wanted my shares without paying for them. Totally untrue allegations supported by fake documents and falsified witness statements were used to claim for a loss not incurred to pressurise me to hand over my shares. On the false pretence of defending me, Aston Bond took nearly £40,000 of fees but failed to carry out my instructions, pressurised me to settle out of court, gave me fake legal advice which had no basis in law, withheld crucial defence evidence from a judge and presented to court as genuine documents which they knew had been faked by the claimant. At a court hearing, they failed to carry out a court order put in place by a judge then duped me into believing I would lose based on a law that doesn't exist. Aston Bond perverted the course of justice to ensure that I lost a blatantly fraudulent claim against me to help a fraudster cheat me out of £500,000. To cap it all, they charged me at a rate of £15,000 an hour to feed me to the wolves. At a preliminary court hearing, the claimant's legal representatives Clifton Ingram admitted they had absolutely no evidence in support of their claim. In view of this, a judge ordered that the case could not continue until the claimant had gathered some evidence and put in place a mechanism to do this. I complied with this order in full but the claimant did not. Several documents sent to me by the claimant stated they had lost a valuable contract and were in financial difficulty. Jonathan Davis from Clifton Ingram admitted in court that their client had never lost this contract, were not in financial difficulty, had not sustained the loss for which they were claiming and the documents had been faked by their client's director to artificially devalue my shares. This is known as fraud. Jonathan Davis further admitted the company's director and accountant had colluded together to concoct falsified witness statements which is a criminal offence and carries a mandatory prison sentence. Jonathan Davis admitted in court and writing that the motivation for litigation was simply to pressurise me to hand over valuable shares to the director. This is an "Ulterior Motive" which is not permitted in law. The case against me was dead in the water so how is it possible to lose a court case after the claimant has admitted in court that it is a total work of fiction? Clifton Ingram knew beyond any doubt that their client was a pathological liar and fraudster and the allegations, documentary evidence and witness statements had been concocted as part of a £500,000 fraud against me. When the evidence I had presented to Aston Bond was presented in court, the claim against me would be exposed as fraud and their client was staring into the abyss. Their only way out was to find some way to force me to concede and they did this with the help of my Defence barrister, Marc Brittain. He was appointed on the basis he was cheap but was in fact a convicted criminal who'd been sentenced to 9 months in prison for a violent attack. On the day of the court hearing, a two stage deception was instigated. I had prepared a detailed 21 page document fully explaining my defence along with 500 pages of evidence and gave clear instructions on how my defence was to be presented. Disregarding all of this, Marc Brittain simply entered into a private meeting with the judge and duped him into believing the case against me was watertight and I had no defence to offer. He then invented an imaginary law then duped me into believing I would lose the case on this basis. Under severe economic duress, I reluctantly agreed to transfer my remaining £250,000 of shares to the claimant for £1. The claimant's director David Brown pleaded that the company was on the point of financial ruin because of my actions however, within three months of the court case, he purchased a house costing around £450,000 more than the one he owned when I foolishly gave him £250,000 of shares for free.