I took out a trial of New Scientist but decided it was not worth the subscription cost. When I tried to cancel, I found the process less than straightforward. If you are considering a trial, I reco... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren
Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren
I took out a trial of New Scientist but decided it was not worth the subscription cost. When I tried to cancel, I found the process less than straightforward. If you are considering a trial, I reco... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Took out time limited offer and cancelled in good time. They ignored cancellation and took further £65 from card. They reluctantly agreed to refund within ten working days. At end of period said probl... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
You start a trial with the intention of giving the product a go. You set up a reminder on your calendar to either cancel or continue with subscription. They process the renewal charge more than one... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Science news and science articles from New Scientist
2 Derry Street, W8 5TT, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen
Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.
Hat 100 % seiner negativen Bewertungen beantwortet
Antwortet meist innerhalb von 1 Woche
So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot
Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.
My periodic dose of facts, trends and implications of living in a modern technological society, in my California mail box, every week! While retired, I still get to keep up on evolutions, original ideas, and new trends in science...and, often, beyond. It is my anchor, in my belief that human beings CAN be honorable, and considerate, and inventive, despite the nightly news, or the bleatings of some wanna-be politician. And, I have neighbors who beg me for my back copies; they get passed around from house to house on my street in this rural California community, since I retired here from Silicon Valley.
Keep it up, and I'll keep ponying up. Maintain that same attention to important detail...in both the science, and the proficient use of our common language. And, with my forefathers having migrated from the UK, it's often a dose of connection to my ancestral roots.

Antwort von New Scientist
I have been a subscriber for over a decade and have just cancelled my subscription. The target audience has shifted I think - it's now aimed at a school audience, and seems to be obsessed with targeting girls.
It has become a 'zine' aimed at entertaining rather than challenging.
So I've voted with my feet. Scientific American or Science look like better options, or Nature at a push.
If you would like a balanced view, you’re not gonna find it here. It’s a shame cause I actually enjoy most of the content. At every possibility they have to mention Trump in a negative way. I get it, he wasn’t supposed to win. Also in the comment section, the journalist? was rabbiting on about how the right wingers were ruining Twitter for her. In my experience it’s from both sides, but hey that must make me a Nazi.
I would just like to comment in the hope that NS take seriously the amount of poor reviews. I had an old and now seemingly outdated view and respect for the magazine. Please make it be known when a boardroom meeting has been had and acted upon in view of getting 99.9% science content back and its branded characteristics. Until then I am inclined to search your competitors.
I've been a New Scientist subscriber for literally decades and have generally thoroughly enjoyed the magazine every week. The quality and breath of articles was very good.
In the last few years I've noticed that the non-scientific content has increased and the quality of the articles decreased. Silly mistakes and ambiguities have crept in that should never have made it past the editorial staff (e.g. confusion with power & energy!) Such instances made me question continuing with paying a significant amount of money just to read an ever decreasing number of good articles, which are still to be found. However I did continue in the hope of seeing an improvement.
Then there was the revamp and change of editor last year! This ushered in only more detrimental aspects. Now we have "Games", "Culture" sections, constant adverts for NS events and rather simplistic cooking/hands on experiment sections. Other, dedicated publications exist for these things. This is NOT what I pay good money for in a NS subscription.
So, reluctantly, I have decided not renew my MS subscription in 2020.

Antwort von New Scientist
Terrible app. I constantly struggle to get my login recognised, and have been locked out each time I come back to the app a few days later. I have had to give up many times. It is no user friendly. The help phoneline does not seem capable of giving sensible advice either.

Antwort von New Scientist
The magazine is ok but I'm sick and tired of its sending spam emails asking me to subscribe literally every single day of the year.

Antwort von New Scientist
I gave them my email address and now the emails from them are endless and don't seem to stop after telling them to fork off.
For example it's 12:20pm and I have allready recieved 3 emails from them today.
**Update 2**
Now the digital subscription has disappeared from my subscription, leaving me only with print. Or actually without print as the magazines are no longer arriving.
**Update**
Subscription email address still not updated.
Neither replacement nor subsequent issue have arrived.
The magazine is really very good, it's light enough to read easily but still informative. Of course, nothing is covered in any depth but there's certainly enough to whet an appetite.
And that's where the good bit ends, the subscription service is flawed. My subscription was started at the wrong date, and then on the correct starting date - well the magazine just didn't arrive and I have no faith in the replacement or subsequent issues turning up.
Customer Service was surly and uncooperative, implying that I had failed as a customer because I hadn't reported their errors earlier.
If you want to change your email address, you may as well put a note in a bottle and sling it in the sea.
On the whole, what a shame. Its not a cheap rag, but they treat it as such. Please don't cheapen yourselves NS by replying with the customer care email address, everyone complaining have clearly been in touch previously and the reviews are the result.

Antwort von New Scientist
Tried for the second time to order this magazine; issues never turned up, customer service claimed Canada Post was losing them (seriously?), and have not cancelled my sub despite multiple requests to do so. And what kind of online subscription service doesn't let you cancel online? I am never, ever, dealing with NS again.

Antwort von New Scientist
Have been a subscriber for years. Quite disappointed with the lack of response to problems regarding downloading magazines after Re-subscribing, even though my subscription remains current. I can’t recommend the service and will consider unsubscribing.

Antwort von New Scientist
I have been a subscriber since March, having bought a one year web and ap subscription. I tried several times to access the "Manage my Account" page. The reason for wanting to was to check if there is any auto-renewal flag set. Several people have told me New Scientist is well know for ignoring cancellation requests, take the money for renewal, and not returning it. After some exchange of emails I received the final reply from Mr Arnold Spencer (how much more English can you get?). Arnold told there are technical issues with that page, trying to fix...

Antwort von New Scientist
DO NOT GIVE THIS RAG YOUR MONEY.
Buyer beware - they cannot fix online issues promptly. I've been unable to activate a subscription that my card has already been charged for. No refund and now I must get a new card issued to prevent recurring billings. It's not "New Scientist" - its just "Old Fraud".

Antwort von New Scientist
Absolutely will not deal with these incompetent people again they have stuffed up our subscription so completely. We cannot believe the lack of customer service you should be ashamed.
Dr Werner Fabian

Antwort von New Scientist
Awful politicised rubbish. Took £125 without my knowledge, sent receipt to the wrong address, no refund.

Antwort von New Scientist
Recently, I have been going through a pile of New Scientist magazines from 2017/early 2018. The decline between then and now in terms of the breadth and the quality of content is quite striking. As an inveterate magazine reader, I don't think I have ever witnessed such a sudden nosedive in standards.
Under the editor, Emily Wilson, who was appointed, I believe in April or May, 2018, New Scientist has fallen prey to entropy, regressing to a superficial shadow of its former self; a lifestyle magazine, heavy on op-ed; not above using dogma as a means of crow-barring-in various fashionable progressive social agendas (many of which I do support). This is science on the same level as posting a picture of the Crab Nebula on your social media, accompanied by a quote from the movie 'Interstellar'. It's all posture; the lazy pretence of knowledge.
The new format of the magazine is clearly intended to cast a wider net and engage with new readers from new demographics, which is both admirable and sensible from a commercial standpoint. Sadly, a periodical this slender on meaningful content is unlikely to hold the attention of these potential readers, who are certainly intelligent enough to know when they are pandered to.

Antwort von New Scientist
Bought an online subscription for family member who is seriously ill. It didn’t give him access so I emailed. Got some generic list of obvious things to try which was completely unhelpful. Phoned them and some guy sent a link that worked for one issue. Family member emailed. They ignored him. He sent another. Got another unhelpful list of questions back. I rang again and was told that they don’t do refunds so even though he hasn’t been able to access something that I’ve paid for, they won’t give me my money back. Appalling service. Never touching this magazine again.

Antwort von New Scientist
Ordered a one off copy that was a compilation of several issues online which said would take 3-5days.
I paid for the postage and the magazine for it not to have arrived over a month later, several phone calls and emails later and I’m still waiting. I’ve constantly been told they are very sorry but I had to wait over 28 days before they would do anything. Then they apparently resent the magazine which again hasn’t arrived and now they have escalated it to another team but can not say how long this will take.
Certainly would not recommend purchasing online with them or there customer service.
Unable to review the magazine as still waiting!
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the destruction of YouTube because the author didn’t like something she saw on it, Brilliant, let’s silence free speech, very scientific. It’s a sad day for science, it’s no place for SJW’s. Can we have authors chosen for scientific merit rather than gender please.

Antwort von New Scientist
Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.
Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.
Hier finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.
Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.
Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.