Courtlinked.com Bewertungen 

139
•
TrustScore 4.5 von 5

4,6

Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren

Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren

Das sagen Bewerter

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Courtlinked filed the paperwork for my small claim case, scheduled the trial with the proper court and sent out a demand letter in one easy affordable process

Unternehmen hat geantwortet

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

3rd cases filed as a business claiming and seeking unpaid invoices. I submit my case with full confidence that Courtlinked.com can and will handle the process. Once submitted, I wait for their experts... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

I was able to get all my questions answered and walked through the entire process. I would recommend court linked to anyone who is looking for guidance on how to do a small claim court.

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Courtlinked provides a gap service that greatly assists small business owners like me when customers fail to make their payments for services provided. Since the fees I earn are small, it is not cost... Mehr ansehen

Unternehmensdetails

  1. Rechtsdienstleistungen & Verwaltung

Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen

CourtLinked.com has been engineered to assist individuals with common legal matters. Save Time & Money on legal issues such as Name Changes, Small Claims, Trademarks, and much more. Simply answer a questionnaire designed by CourtLinked, and your documents will be prepared within 24 hours. For certain services, Courtlinked.com uses powerful Legal Firms, knowledgeable Attorneys, & Paralegals to ensure legal quality


Kontaktinformationen

4,6

Hervorragend

TrustScore 4.5 von 5

139 Bewertungen

5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern

Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen

Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.

Hat 100 % seiner negativen Bewertungen beantwortet

Antwortet meist innerhalb von 24 Std.

So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot

Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.

4,6

Alle Bewertungen

(139)

18 Bewertungen in den letzten 12 Monaten

Bewertung abgeben
Unternehmen auf Trustpilot dürfen keine finanziellen oder anderweitigen Anreize oder Gegenleistungen für das Verbergen von Bewertungen anbieten. Bewertungen spiegeln die Meinung einzelner Nutzer wider und nicht die von Trustpilot. Mehr erfahren

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Fraud and demeaning/hostile if you complain about anything

I had initially used this service to file for small claims court. They advertised as professionals and said they would do review and even attempt to find addresses of persons. I paid $169 and when they sent my paperwork it had a type. I may have made this initially I am not sure. Either way I replied that if they had professionals reviewing this should have been easily noticed. I guess they get a large amount of complaints and did not hesitate to immediately become hostile in their replies. They talked down to me and still have not made it clear whether they will honor the refund guarantee advertised also. I did not use their paperwork and don't want it. They appear to literally just copy and paste with no actual review and there's no evidence they even attempted any address location when that was also a reasoning for choosing their services. I am more upset by how quickly they turned hostile and how common this is for them at any critique, this is unprofessional to say the least. They talked to me as if I am uneducated and were extremely disrespectful and reactive. I genuinely believe they need more professionalism and to consider how they would feel as a customer being talked to in such a way, or even just a human being. I am educated but I am a mother with a disabled child and disabled veteran husband. I am busy, I needed help and I got hostility the very moment I mentioned being unsatisfied. I am disheartened they'd talk to anyone this way not just as a professional business but as human beings to another. I have also noticed they always reply to bad reviews as hostile and demeaning as well and often threaten legal action. That's not professional or warranted and since you've sent others checks for refunds that have come back for insufficient funds I'd be curious to know what person is actually behind this seemingly suspicious "company." I think I'm going to be doing some digging and social media reaching out. I won't tolerate how I and others have been treated. Accountability needs taken.

Their reply is as expected. They always reply hostile to any negativity and just deny. They literally never take any accountability. Ridiculous.

7. März 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Courtlinked.com has been conducting this service since 2004 nationwide with over 100K cases filed successfully. We receive daily positive feedback on our professionalism, paperwork processing, fast courteous/professional responses and case outcomes. We do not make any mistakes and if there is a typo it is changed during the case client review process. “Cut and Paste” is applying your questionnaire to a legal complaint that has a 98% approval daily with our clients.

Our firm charges $84.95 to prepare, file and manage the service of small claims case based on the information provided to us by the claimant. Our task is to research the court venue, petitions involved, rule of law in accordance to state laws and UCC Business Protocols – locate statutory of a business.

We do not conduct any individual research for an address. We are not an investigation firm and we do not advertise such service. In fact, on our website clearly states that you need the address of your defendant.

The information provided by Mrs. Tabitha Thomas was used to research the venue, draft the complaint in accordance to State Laws, and submit for client review, obtain signature, file the case and forward to a third-party licensed serving management.

On February 8, 2024 (10:27AM), Mrs. Tabitha Thomas, received the petitions, did not indicate any changes to be made and questioned us if she can email back the signed petitions. Our courteous paralegal replied in under a minute of email receipt that originals are needed. Soon after, we received a chargeback notice with an email insulting our services.

We will NOT tolerate any insults, rude comments or meritless demands and we are not your defendants. We are here to help you. Mrs. Tabitha Thomas could have asked for a cancellation in more courteous manner. Our paralegals are very professional, here to assist and we will NOT BE TREATED otherwise. We charge $84.95 which does NOT do justice. Our prices are low to assist individuals and business recover monetary justice using small claims court.

Client that do not want to proceed contact us in courteous manner ask for a dismissal, cancellation and a refund - depending on the stage of the case.

Mr. Tabitha Thomas has filed a (pending) chargeback preventing us from issuing a full refund regardless of work done.

Courtlinked.com does not ask for the publication of positive reviews received daily and we respond to every email and online opinions.

Mr. Tabitha Thomas never completed the service entirely to express a real review unfortunately.


REFUND RECEIPT

Subtotal $169.95. ($84.95 + $95.00 Private Process Third Party)
Total Paid $169.95
Signature not required
Card customer
****5353
Txn Type: PURCHASE
Response: APPROVED
Approval Code: 062517
Auth Mode: ISSUER
Txn ID: #f5657e63
Type: CREDIT
Card Type: VISA
Batch Number: 1
Entry Mode: KEYED
Mon-Sun

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Five out of Five Stars for CourtLinked.com

Five out of Five Stars for CourtLinked.com. For a very low fee they wrote a demand letter to the defendants and it was delivered by the sheriff. It doesn't get any better. A real attorney wants $5000 for a demand letter - I wrote my own for about $70 and it was delivered by the sheriff. They also filed my small claims case in Special Civil and it was accepted. I did get my money back so the case didn't go all the way and they retrieved the case for me. Very courteous and informative to deal with. They only use email these days. Nice to deal with. It is a self help kind of set up. This company was a life saver for me.

17. September 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Thank you for taking your time to post this review.

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

You'll only end up wanting to take THEM…

You'll only end up wanting to take THEM to small claims.
On 3/24/23 I payed this business $164.90 to write and send a demand letter, as well as file a small claims case for me.
Their website makes several promises, including that the demand letter is sent before filing a claim, in an effort to settle the dispute without going to court, as well as showing good faith if it does end up going to court.
They also promise to do all the legal work, inuding finding the right court house, filing the claim, servicing the defendant AND providing proof of service to the court. Their site claims that they do all the legal work and you "simply have to show up for trial."
Their site promises 100% satisfaction guaranteed, or your money back.
First of all, they never created a demand letter, despite several emails from me asking when that would be done. And second, they failed to provide the court proof of service, so my case was dismissed. I received a response from the defendant, meaning they got served, I told courtlink this and asked what the next step was, and they just said it was in the courts hands now.
When my case got dismissed due to them failing to provide proof of service, I asked for a refund as well as a reimbursement for the $53 I payed to the court to file the claim. I'm going to have to pay another $53 to re file it correctly.
They said they don't refund for cases already filed and said it wasn't their fault if the defendant wasn't served. ( As you can see from many other reviews, it's never their fault. It's always yours. They're full of excuses.)
They did not offer a refund until after I sent them pictures from their website proving that they did not deliver on what they promised, and said I would be writing a BBB complaint and a 1 star review.
This is unprofessional service at best. You should not have to resort to these methods before a business provides you with the quality care and work they promise to provide. That should be there from day one.

24. März 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Courtlinked.com and its associates have been processing cases nationwide since 2004. We have successfully filed and assisted individuals obtaining justice under a limited jurisdiction. We do not ask for reviews and positive reviews received daily are not published. Each case received has it process, proceedings and entities involved. This is a legal process/service utilized by individual to obtain monetary damages from entities that have refused to resolve the cause of action at hand; majority of defendant evade service or relocate. When this occurs, it is common for us to be blamed along with the failure of the claimant to conduct proper diligence on their case.

Ms. Victoria Whitaker utilized our services and paid $84.95 for small claims package (includes certified mail service) and $79.95 for a demand letter that used due to the one-time restricted mail serving approach retained. She did not pay for a sheriff or third party process.

The case was professionally drafted, proper research was done to correct the entity she was suing (her submitted questionnaire would have been dismissed as is), work/research was emailed to Victoria Whitaker and the case was signed and approved by her for court submission.

Her case was filed correctly (case# CC202309787). The filed petitions were mailed to her along with a sheet of instruction provided by the courthouse for Victoria Whitaker to conduct her diligence in regards to defendants answer, certified mail return and additional court proceeding/follow-ups. The case was served by certified mail which was sent to the courthouse upon receipt of signature from the statuary agent. The courthouse did not accept the method retained and or the deadline for the certified mail serving was not within the legal time frame.

Arizona Small Claims requires service on the defendant within 45 days of filing. Certified mail serving is not an effective method of service. If the correspondence is not signed, returned late or the signatures are not valid, the courthouse dismisses the case. Third party/sheriff service was presented, but not retained.

Courtlinked conducted everything within the scope of service with the expectation of the demand letter which was canceled pending refund after closure of case.

After numerous email exchanges. Victoria Whitaker has received a full refund and we also provided her the options to refile the case at no charge which she has refused.

Victoria Whitaker has our completed materials along with the research to refile her Case.

Every state, county and city has their process. Claimants filing cases must always conduct their diligence with us or the courthouses once the case is filed.

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

CourtLinked was to mail a demand letter…

CourtLinked was to mail a demand letter to an individual that was doing work on my house.. but then after sometime stopped coming because I contracted Covid...I never received a copy of the demand letter as stated on their website.. all they sent me was a document for me to fill out.. that's called a SCAM...I want my money back...not sure when I requested the demand letter

20. März 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

This review along with a "Google Review" is the only form of communication conducted by Mr. DiMatteo. No inquiries was every made, our emails to him went unanswered and as stated above he forgot what service he retained. This could have been resolved with a simple courteous email.

The small claims case for Pennsylvania was processed by him on January 2023; the drafted court petitions was emailed to him for review along with another set of copies emailed sent on Mar 16, 2023.

The order he submitted was for a small claims package, not a demand letter and paid $84.95. The service was conducted pending his review/signatures/evidence and return for filing. Since January-March 2023, Mr. DiMatteo has failed to return the requested materials, has not made any proper communication and now has claimed "SCAM".

He has received our research, court research and our drafted petitions via email, but continues to label a reputable firm as "SCAM". We value our clients and our reputation, therefore canceled out his case along with a FULL REFUND (receipt below).

Below is the transaction receipt for his full refund as we do not operate within the opinions of Mr. DiMatteo.


Receipt #3667-2055
Refunded
$84.95
Date issued
March 20, 2023


Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Do not use Courtlinked, file on your own or find a live lawyer.

Do not use Courtlinked. They are a scam organization that promises everything you want to hear to get your money and then when it comes time to deliver, they do the bare minimum. When you raise questions, they tell you that they have done everything they are supposed to do and then threaten to take legal action against you if you report their failure to deliver to expectations.

29. Dezember 2022
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

    Case Info: Florida Miami-Dade 22-43535 SP 05
    Case Style: BRIJESH MANNATTUPARAMPIL vs. MIGUEL ANGEL ANDUJ

Mr. Brijesh Mannattuparampil simply wanted free services and has threatened to place reviews/BBB complaint.

This review is merely towards the fact that Compass Investigations (third-party) licensed process server in Florida could not make contact with his defendant at the address provided by Mr. Mannattuparampil.

This case was professional drafted by us, approved by Mr. Brijesh Mannattuparampil, filed and case was sent to the third-party server with payment to serve his defendant at the address he provided.

The licensed server could not make contact his defendant, Mr. Brijesh Mannattuparampil was notified and demanded that Compass Investigations proceed at another address. Compass Investigations, Sheriff's Department and private process server charge per location. This is not a free service and not in our control.

This review is placed merely on the fact that Brijesh Mannattuparampil simply wanted free services from a third-party county licensed process server, did not want to pay a civil servant and blaming us for not paying. We did not have the budget to cover his second serving.

He only paid us $84.95 (prepare, file and submit for serving) and $95.00 which was paid to Compass Investigations - a very comprehensive investigations firm in FL.

This is the main reason of our negative reviews - clients that blame us because the individual that owes them money has evaded service via third-party or simply expect free services from businesses entities.

We are a reputable firm conducting this service since 2004, we do not ask for reviews (positive feedback received daily) and we will not allow our name to be tarnished or held hostage to a false threats/reviews to cover an expense not to our fault.


   Our Job Number: 2023000310
    Your Reference Number: Mannattuparampil
    Party To Be Served: ANDUJAR, MIGUEL ANGEL
    Documents To Be Served: NOTICE TO APPEAR FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND STATEMENT OF CLAIM
    Case Info: Florida Miami-Dade 22-43535 SP 05
    Case Style: BRIJESH MANNATTUPARAMPIL vs. MIGUEL ANGEL ANDUJAR

Original Service Address: MIGUEL ANGEL ANDUJAR, 130 NE 130TH STREET, NORTH MIAMI, FL 33161

Status Update for MIGUEL ANGEL ANDUJAR, 130 NE 130TH STREET, NORTH MIAMI, FL 33161

Latest Status: 1/16/2023 2:15 pm Attempted service at 130 NE 130TH STREET, NORTH MIAMI, FL 33161, no answer at residence, no cars in driveway

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Bad!!

Bad!!! It has been such an interesting journey with CourtLink. Yes they can do very rudimentary and perfunctory service. Anything just a notch over basic of the basic and they are at a loss. Their website leads one to believe they provide much more service than these amateurs are capable of performing. Even on basic stuff I have had to take the lead and help them through the process. My vision of this is a bunch of, as they say "associates", that will one day graduate, and maybe, get hired by a legal firm, only to discover you simply cannot be this sloppy while providing professional services.
They used to have an 800# listed on their website but call it and get a voice recording they don't do that level of support. Everything is handled via email, and good luck with that. If you ask more than one question, they pick the easiest one, maybe two, and ignore the rest. Also, don't make the mistake of using the support link on their website. You will never get a response from that and when questioned in one of the many, many emails back and forth, they will even deny there is a support link on their website, yet there is still exists.
To sum up, I would not ever use CourtLink ever again for any purpose.
UPDATE:
In response to the response from CourtLink.
Re: “A demand letter…” All true. This is the basic stuff I said they handled.
Re: “All his questions…” They were repetitious because they were not answered. I agree I probably came across short because I do not expect to have to drag information out of people getting paid to provide that information. So they try my patience and get offended when they are called out for their inadequacies.
Re: “The real reason…” Not even close. The lack of professionalism and service is the real reason for this review. This started from the very beginning. I signed up and paid and heard nothing. Did I get signed up? Did they get the money? I know my credit card was hit. I sent two messages via their support link on their website. More of nothing. I then get hold of another email support address and finally get a response. When I asked why they never sent me anything nor responded to the requests through their website they claimed they have no such support link on their website. After I sent them a picture of it they responded “We will investigate this further…”. That link is still on their website.
Re: the rest of their response. Just smoke. It appears the problem here is they actually believe they are doing a good service. I deal with professionals all the time and I am sorry to say I must disagree with their assessment; they were a total pain to work with from the very start.

25. Oktober 2022
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Thank you for taking the time for this review - although we do not ask for any review on positive feedback received daily, we will take the time to respond accordingly.

Mr. Jolliff filed 2 orders with Courltinked.com.

A demand letter that was professional drafted and approved by him for processing along with the filing of a small claims that was drafted, correctly filed and now submitted for service (CC2022175183SC) - pending results from a licensed process server in Arizona. This is a case that was recently filed.

All his questions (most of them repetitious and very rude) were promptly answered in the most courteous manner. The real reason for this review is that Mr. Jolliff is requesting a service that is outside the scope of our process (address change) a petition we are not allowed to file. The claimant must complete the request for address change, sign and to notify the courthouse and his defendant by mail.

We of course researched and provided him the forms needed. We also prepared it for him pending the additional open fields, signature and court mailing. This review is simply for a legal case proceeding that falls within his discretion (such as change of address, preparation for trial and evidence gathering).

We go the extra mile for all our clients and have completed his case pending final status of service on his defendant. We will still assist him with any additional questions or requests.

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Called customer service and not in…

Called customer service and not in service because of Covid. No instructions on how to edit something once done. How do you edit ?
Is this summary just a summary that you will use to write the letter

Why do I have two transactions for the same pending ? I will pay for one letter if someone calls me so I can edit it. Is the summary turned into a legal professional letter that I can review before it’s mailed ? Please advise

6. September 2022
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Your order was just placed quickly followed by your 1-star review (demand letter).

Client has not yet received or experienced the quality of our service and has quickly placed this review without proper email contact or usage.

Communication protocols are instructed online and our website clearly indicates that our paralegals will contact you, correct the mistake and you will have a change to modify as you see fit.

Our clients receive prompt responses within the business day (24/7) and have no issues with communication.

You have quickly placed a meritless review within minutes of processing your order. A simple email will have answered all your questions promptly in regards to the process and corrections if any.

We will cancel/refund this out as our firm does not operate this way and this review is placed without any merits or usage of our service.

Courtlinked.com does not ask or publish positive reviews received daily. If there is any issue, it will be corrected or refunded per our terms of use.

Please email support@courtlinked.com - placing questions on this platform will not resolve your issue.

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I used this service in order to file a…

I used this service in order to file a claim in small claims court in 2019. A King County, WA court preliminary court date was finally scheduled in 2022. I paid to have the defendant served. They were not. The case was dismissed. I contacted Courtlinked.com numerous times over the year(s) and they refused to refund my money. NOT WORTH IT. They will scam you for your money.

28. März 2022
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We conducted the filing but never received notice of the preliminary date - if so, we would have conducted the service as we do with cases daily.

As the claimant, you should always followup on your case in regards to the serving status as these are done via third party firms - not us. Calling us "SCAM" is completely irrelevant.

Upon checking with King County, the clerk also indicated that these materials were sent directly to you.

We can apply a refund of the serving fees paid and or conduct the new serving.

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Robbie was extremely helpful and…

Robbie was extremely helpful and patient with me.
It was great having a company to take care of all the details for a court case. It's very complicated without help. I will recommend this company to friends and colleagues.

14. März 2022
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I urge everyone to read this full…

I urge everyone to read this full review. They are going to attempt to respond to this to discredit any negative review, but they know they committed fraud, tried to cover it up with a refund, only to fail to provide any sort of acceptable level of customer service. CL will try to deflect where they think they can here. I have full evidence and email threads to all of this. The CA AG will be getting this complaint.

**Edit in response to CL**. For those that didn’t catch the Gaslighting - They refuse to even acknowledge or discuss that they told me that first sent my documents on August 9th. The postmark and date of their check to the court was after September 14th, 2021. This is their fraudulent claim and the actual reason they refunded me. The rest of my complaint after they refunded me was their total lack of any follow up with me, the fact they did not use sheriff services as was the option on their site to serve the defendant, and the fact that they withheld information from me for a month which allowed the case to expire after this long wait period. Instead of apologizing, they are coming with a holier than thou attitude that because they refunded me, it excuses them from living up to their commitments to me, even on what they call “free service.” That free service was given due to their fraud to begin with.

I paid to file a small claims case on July 2nd, 2021. The initial process on their site was about as much satisfaction as I would get out of this 5 month nightmare. After I filed, it took me a few weeks to find a service address to send a process server to the defendant. This was completed on August 5th and now it was a waiting game.

August 17th - I followed up asking how long this normally takes. They responded 15-30 days depending on court docket. They specifically stated they sent this in on August 9th, first fraudulent claim.

Sept 9th - I followed up again asking for an update as it had been a month from their stated date. They responded saying “nothing yet, should be this month.”

Sept 28th - I followed up again asking if we could look into what happened, they said their check had not cleared and it should be this or next week.

Oct 4th - I get a call from a local county court clerk. They state that Courtlinked filed in the wrong court. During this call, I asked how long it would take if we had to send this to a new court because the original wait had been so long, since Courtlinked indicated it was the court’s fault for the wait. The clerk stated that it only takes a couple days once they get mail and it was no way the court’s fault. The clerk sent me everything they sent the court. Courtlinked had not sent anything in until September 15th, which was the date of their check, I have this as evidence. I’m furious.

Oct 4th - I email Courtlinked extremely upset. They never admit to sending it later, however the postmark date and check are all the evidence I need to see they are lying. However they offer to refund me in full and work my case at no charge. As upset as I am, I agree to this and to take down negative reviews along with my BBB complaint. I’m hopeful based on this act of decent customer service.

Oct 20th - The correct court receives the filing and I’m hopeful this will be completed.

Oct 24th - I ask what the process is for serving the defendant. They tell me I need to wait for service reports.

Oct 31st - No updates from CL, I once again have to ask. They cannot provide an update.

Nov 6th - I again have to reach out as they have not said a word to me. They state its NOW been assigned to a service company. Weeks later. I had also paid for the Sheriff to serve the defendant. CL throws it in my face that they are doing this for free. I remind them that they are doing it for free because they fraudulently told me that this was in process, when in fact all they did is collect my money and sit on it.

Nov 11th - No updates from them still. I ask for the service company name. They provide it but state the company will not talk to me and I have to go through them. The only update is that service was attempted. I wait.

Nov 19th - No updates from them, I have to chase them down every god damn week. They state this takes time. Due to my previous interactions with them, I don’t trust them at all. They did not give this to the sheriff as I asked. Also the case will be dismissed in AZ if nothing happens in 45 days. I suspect they are waiting for this.

Dec 2nd - Today. STIL NO UPDATES. I have to ask again. They finally provide me with a copy of the report from the service company. It states that on NOVEMBER 9th was the last attempt made and the address may not be where the defendant is. THEY DID NOT TELL ME THIS. This company is a fraud. I complain to them and they throw it in my face that they are doing this “for free.” They are only doing this for free so I don’t file a fraud claim with the BBB and AG, which I now plan to do. 5 months.

3. Dezember 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Mr. Hoffman is claiming "fraud" in meritless allegation on free services he has received because of time-frame, case research, processing, court submission from California in a high volume, review and return from the courthouse (not to mention slight Covid delays). The case was first rejected because it fell in the wrong precinct during court review which was corrected promptly and filed. This happens once in awhile, it is part of the process. It is corrected and completed.

Mr. Hoffman received a refund because he was extremely upset about the incorrect precinct and started to emails us with "fraudulent allegation" and quickly placing reviews online upon clerk notice/call - before we had a change to review the issue and correct. We quickly emailed him to indicate that this happens when defendant falls within another precinct. He apologized and removed the reviews. He also expressed to us that he was having a financial hardship so we decided to take the case at cost which has now become a slap in the face.

Now he claims fraud because his defendant was not served by a licensed third party server, placing his bases on our time frame, courthouse correction, obtaining payment to cover his filing fees and high volume we submit weekly to the courts by mail. We do not rush cases and this is within our time frame; especially when we are covering all the costs. At the end, he received a free service and now we are an easier target since the actual person he is suing is evading and has evaded which has resulted in this case. All his emails were promptly answered within minutes/hours and cc'd in with the third party serving firm (civil process servers are more prompt, more expensive and that is what we retained for his case).

Mr. Hoffman upset at us because the actual party that did commit the fraud is evading service by a third party licensed server. However, we still value him as client and here to help him with this case but he do not have control on defendants that are elusive. We file, third parties serve. We have offered to help him refile the case (in AZ you have 45 days to serve) at no cost with his assistance to find/serve the defendant and help with the serving cost. How can we be fraud when he received a full refund, confirmed case number/filing and confirmation from the licensed server of non-service; not to mention prompt replies to all his inquiries. General court time frames provided, our process, court submission/responses, third party firm communication, etc., does not constitute fraud. Refund was also made in full because of this harsh attacks during the venue change request and to assist him towards the financial hardship claimed - out of our generosity.

The third party server finally responded and has indicated in their report that the address provided by Mr. Hoffmann on his
defendant is "bad".

We have helped individuals/businesses nationwide since 2004 to be wrongfully claimed as fraud (especially on free services) and have conducted hundreds of pro-bono work; covering costs and free services for individuals that need assistance - which you can see from the reviews below. We are also highly referred by AG nationwide. BBB is meaningless to us because we will not pay for a membership to retain an "A' grade when majority using BBB return for legal actions.

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Excellent service

Excellent service. They handled all my needs and request in a very timely manner. Would highly recommend their service. Also would like to add that I won my case. Lol.

30. November 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Demand Letter

I'm disabled and needed a letter that would get results. I was concerned that I would have to go to court to get my money. Courtlinked wrote a Demand Letter, and on the 15th day, I got a check for the amount requested. I'm grateful that Courtlinked helped me.

14. November 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

NJ- First time for any suit- Great experience

First time for any suit. CourtLinked took care of the needed paperwork to file in NJ. Once I filled the defendant (a business) called me and took ownership and offered to pay the full amount I was asking for including filing fees and the $100 for this service (a bargain for the time saved). As such I emailed CourtLinked who told me the procedure to close the suit. I am SO grateful to CourtLinked for their services that helped me resolve this matter. Thank you!

3. August 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

"I received my things back!!"

Hello,
I just really wanted to genuinely thank you for all of your hard work and dedication to us customers. Thanks to your demand letter; my things were delivered by uber and a couple of things I had were more sentimental than monetary value. I started crying I was so Happy. I'm so grateful and I guarantee you I'd never see those things again if it weren't for you all.

30. Juni 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Brittny, it was our pleasure.Thank you for the review and taking the time to place this.

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Exceptional Service!

I’ve been procrastinating resolving this situation with an inept real estate agent that I dealt with. I went to mediation, was too late for arbitration, so I decided on small claims court. The filing and paper work seemed daunting and then I stumbled across CourtLink and it was money well spent to have them handle filing and processing for me. Anytime I checked back on the status of things, I received a prompt email response (even on weekends)….if you’re daunted and intimidated by this task, let them guide you through the process and save yourself so ouch worry and grief!

7. Juni 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Charged me for services not rendered

Charged me for services not rendered. Definitely a scam site.

8. April 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Unknown client. We do not operate this way. Been processing cases since 2004. If a case is not processed, filed or simply canceled by the claimant a refund is applied in full. Please contact us and if you are a valid client, we will make sure you get a full refund.

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Non-Refundable Travel Expenses Can be Refundable

We had two cases with them, one for $9,500 and one for $600 and both were processed efficiently and resulted in settlement and payment before trial dates. Anyone that lost money due to the Covid19 pandemic should consider using the Small Claims process to recover their non-refundable travel advances paid funds.

4. Februar 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

Thank you for taking the time to place this review - we strive our best to provide monetary justice under small claims laws.

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

USELESS.

There is absolutely no way this company has 4+ star reviews they have to be planted/fake. This is the most disorganized, hard to reach, impossible to navigate website I've been to. Of course there's no telephone support and each email gets answered days later. USELESS.

26. Jänner 2021
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Courtlinked.com-Logo

Antwort von Courtlinked.com

(Consumers beware of false/none client posting from competitors). Thank you for your review, opinion and comments made about third party vetted review sites. We do not seem to have you as an ACTUAL CLIENT. We have been conducting this service since 2004. Every email is answered promptly (within the same hour/business day) and all orders are professional processed. We make sure every client is satisfied and if we need to take prompt actions on an order/case - our paralegals will make sure there is a satisfied resolution.

So funktioniert Trustpilot

Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.

Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.

Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.

Hier ​finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.

Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.

Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.

Erfahren Sie mehr